Hyde v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hyde v. State

506 So. 2d 1185, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1257, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 1987

DocketNo. 86-2694

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 506 So. 2d 1185 (Hyde v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyde v. State, 506 So. 2d 1185, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1257, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed on appellant departed from the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines law. Appel-lee concedes that there were no written reasons given for departure. Although oral reasons for departure were given, this does not satisfy the statutory requirement of written reasons. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). Therefore, the sentence herein is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed on appellant departed from the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines law. Appel-lee concedes that there were no written reasons given for departure. Although oral reasons for departure were given, this does not satisfy the statutory requirement of written reasons. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). Therefore, the sentence herein is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 So. 2d 1185, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1257, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack