Hyde v. State
506 So. 2d 1185, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1257, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233
Opinion
The sentence imposed on appellant departed from the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines law. Appel-lee concedes that there were no written reasons given for departure. Although oral reasons for departure were given, this does not satisfy the statutory requirement of written reasons. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). Therefore, the sentence herein is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hyde v. State, 506 So. 2d 1185, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1257, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 1185 (Hyde v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyde v. State
524 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)