Hyde v. Raduns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hyde v. Raduns

263 A.D. 928, 32 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7402

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 7, 1942·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. [929]*929All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the authority of Moore v. Nye (21 N. Y. Supp. 94; 66 Hun, 628 [3d Dept.]; affd., 142 N. Y. 677); Umfreville v. Keeler (1 T. & C. 486 [4th Dept.]); Rich v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (87 N. Y. 382); Adams v. Gillig (199 id. 314); Ochs v. Woods (221 id. 335); Hobaica v. Byrne (216 App. Div. 307, 309), and Bowery National Bank v. Duncan (12 Hun, 405, 408). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover damage for alleged fraud and misrepresentation. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. [929]*929All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the authority of Moore v. Nye (21 N. Y. Supp. 94; 66 Hun, 628 [3d Dept.]; affd., 142 N. Y. 677); Umfreville v. Keeler (1 T. & C. 486 [4th Dept.]); Rich v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (87 N. Y. 382); Adams v. Gillig (199 id. 314); Ochs v. Woods (221 id. 335); Hobaica v. Byrne (216 App. Div. 307, 309), and Bowery National Bank v. Duncan (12 Hun, 405, 408). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover damage for alleged fraud and misrepresentation. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Hyde v. Raduns, 263 A.D. 928, 32 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 928 (Hyde v. Raduns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related