Hyde v. Pizzuto
This text of 195 A.2d 53 (Hyde v. Pizzuto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon conflicting evidence as to liability the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The plaintiff and the named defendant were the operators of automobiles proceeding in opposite directions on the same street. A collision occurred at an intersection. The jury apparently believed the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant operator negligently made a left turn into the path of the plaintiff’s ear. That was the jury’s privilege. Prizio v. Penachio, 146 Conn. 452, 456, 152 A.2d 507.
[702]*702As the trial court has indicated, the verdict was liberal but not excessive. We cannot disturb it. Miner v. McKay, 145 Conn. 622, 624, 145 A.2d 758.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.2d 53, 151 Conn. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-pizzuto-conn-1963.