Hyde v. Pinkard

25 Ark. 163
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 15, 1867
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ark. 163 (Hyde v. Pinkard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyde v. Pinkard, 25 Ark. 163 (Ark. 1867).

Opinion

Compton, J.

The defendants in the court below procured an order of this court, at December term-, 1866, grafting them an appeal in this cause.

The bill was filed to enforce a vendor’s lien. The defendants having been served with process of subpoena thirty days before the return thereof, failed to appear; and a final decree was entered against them, at. the return term. This was error. According to section 19, of chapter 28, Gould’s Digest, the decree should have been interlocutory,.not final. See Gordon v. Church, 11 Ark., 118, where sections 19, 20 and 21 of this chapter of the Digest, in reference to interlocutory and final decrees, are remarked upon and construed.

Let the decree be reversed and the cause remanded, with leave to the defendants to enter their appearance in the court below and to make such defense as they may choose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ark. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-pinkard-ark-1867.