Hyde v. Phoenix Ins. Co.

12 F. Cas. 1113, 2 Dill. 525
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa·Decided July 1, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DILLON, Circuit Judge.

The court perceives no objection, under the circumstances, to granting leave to the plaintiff to file the transcript from the state court alnd to have the suit docketed. The plaintiff may, thereupon, move either to have the cause remanded to the state court or elect to treat it as pending in this court. In the latter event, as the issues were not made up before the removal, the case, under the practice (should there be an answer filed to the merits), is not triable at this term unless by consent; but the issues must be settled during the term, and if the company shall not appear and answer when required, it may be defaulted.

The motion to file the transcript is sustained. Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyde v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 12 F. Cas. 1113, 2 Dill. 525 (circtdia 1873).

12 F. Cas. 1113 (Hyde v. Phoenix Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woolridge v. McKenna
8 F. 650 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1881)