Hyde v. Patterson

1 Abb. Pr. 248
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Clerks, J.

The general unconditional appearance of defendants,' is a waiver of any irregularity in the affidavit.

The mistake in the recital of the bond, does not affect its validity. The essential part of the undertaking, and all that is required by the Code, is contained in the instrument in this case. It makes the sureties liable for the prosecution of the , action, the return of the property, if return be adjudged, and the payment of the costs. And quaere whether the sureties would not be estopped from denying the truth of the recital?

Motion denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyde v. Patterson, 1 Abb. Pr. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

1 Abb. Pr. 248 (Hyde v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Church
172 Misc. 1007 (Broome County Court, 1939)
Springfield Metallic Casket Co. v. Wielar
26 Misc. 863 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1899)