Hyde v. Patterson

New York Supreme Court

Hyde v. Patterson

1 Abb. Pr. 248

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Abb. Pr. 248 (Hyde v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyde v. Patterson, 1 Abb. Pr. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

Clerks, J.

The general unconditional appearance of defendants,' is a waiver of any irregularity in the affidavit.

The mistake in the recital of the bond, does not affect its validity. The essential part of the undertaking, and all that is required by the Code, is contained in the instrument in this case. It makes the sureties liable for the prosecution of the , action, the return of the property, if return be adjudged, and the payment of the costs. And quaere whether the sureties would not be estopped from denying the truth of the recital?

Motion denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clerks, J.

The general unconditional appearance of defendants,' is a waiver of any irregularity in the affidavit.

The mistake in the recital of the bond, does not affect its validity. The essential part of the undertaking, and all that is required by the Code, is contained in the instrument in this case. It makes the sureties liable for the prosecution of the , action, the return of the property, if return be adjudged, and the payment of the costs. And quaere whether the sureties would not be estopped from denying the truth of the recital?

Motion denied, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Abb. Pr. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-patterson-nysupct-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack