Hyde v. Grant

176 A.D. 950

This text of 176 A.D. 950 (Hyde v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyde v. Grant, 176 A.D. 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that it is apparent from the amount of the verdict that the jury were influenced by the charge which in effect permitted them to render a verdict for damages caused to plaintiff’s feelings by the information that an autopsy had been performed, without reference to whether it had been or not. Damages could not be predicated upon mere information, irrespective of whether the remains were actually mutilated, and the charge was in that respect erroneous and so prejudicial as to require a new trial. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-grant-nyappdiv-1917.