Hyde v. Friedman
44 A.D.2d 907, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4901
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The interests of both parties to this appeal will be best served by an immediate trial with a preference. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term in action for injunction.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Mahoney and Del Veeehio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hyde v. Friedman, 44 A.D.2d 907, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).
44 A.D.2d 907 (Hyde v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.