Hyde v. Friedman

44 A.D.2d 907, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4901

This text of 44 A.D.2d 907 (Hyde v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyde v. Friedman, 44 A.D.2d 907, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The interests of both parties to this appeal will be best served by an immediate trial with a preference. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term in action for injunction.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Mahoney and Del Veeehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.D.2d 907, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1974.