Hyde v. Cox
This text of 8 Conn. Super. Ct. 400 (Hyde v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If a decision on this demurrer is to be of any value it should, as a matter of record, clearly define the questions of law sought to be raised.
In its present condition of attack on specific paragraphs it fails to meet the requirements of the Practice Book (1934) § 97, and of form No. 347. Also, see, Hill vs. Fair Haven Westville R.R. Co.,
Moreover if the complaint sets forth a cause of action in the first count, whatever the terminology used, it should be permitted to go to trial. Folwell vs. Howell,
The demurrer is returned without decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Conn. Super. Ct. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-cox-connsuperct-1940.