Hyde v. City of Lakewood

31 Ohio Law Rep. 58
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hyde v. City of Lakewood. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Ohio St. 2d 155
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 19, 1965·No. 38459·Published

Opinion

Zimmerman, Judge.

1. Unless there is a statute removing immunity, a governmental unit or agency may escape liability for the commission of a tort upon a showing that a governmental function was being performed at the time the tort occurred.

2. Whether the performance of various activities by a municipality is governmental or proprietary frequently depends on the peculiar facts of the particular case. In one instance a municipally owned hospital may be found to be carrying on a governmental function in the manner of its operation, whereas in another instance a finding may be made that a municipally owned hospital is being operated in a proprietary capacity.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., O’Neill and Brown, JJ., concur. Matthias, Herbert and Schneider, JJ., concur in case No. 38955 but dissent in case No. 38459.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyde v. City of Lakewood, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 58 (Ohio 1965).

31 Ohio Law Rep. 58 (Hyde v. City of Lakewood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.