Hyde v. Brashear

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hyde v. Brashear

9 Rob. 64

DecidedSeptember 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Rob. 64 (Hyde v. Brashear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyde v. Brashear, 9 Rob. 64 (La. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Morphy, J.

This suit, like that of Gardiner and others against the same defendant, just decided, is brought on the bonds signed by him as surety of the curator of the estate of Wm. S. Barr. The claim is for a sum of $543 63, for goods sold and delivered to the deceased. The grounds of defence taken in this case are the same as those we considered in the other. On the 24th of April, 1834, the plaintiffs received from F. Wharton, the curator’s counsel, $375, which more than pays the two dividends which have been declared in their favor. For this amount the defendant has been allowed a credit below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morphy, J.

This suit, like that of Gardiner and others against the same defendant, just decided, is brought on the bonds signed by him as surety of the curator of the estate of Wm. S. Barr. The claim is for a sum of $543 63, for goods sold and delivered to the deceased. The grounds of defence taken in this case are the same as those we considered in the other. On the 24th of April, 1834, the plaintiffs received from F. Wharton, the curator’s counsel, $375, which more than pays the two dividends which have been declared in their favor. For this amount the defendant has been allowed a credit below.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Rob. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-brashear-la-1844.