Hychko v. Didomizio

632 A.2d 722, 32 Conn. App. 912, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 419
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1993
Docket11944
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 632 A.2d 722 (Hychko v. Didomizio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hychko v. Didomizio, 632 A.2d 722, 32 Conn. App. 912, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 419 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We hold, and the parties agree, that there are material issues of fact yet to be decided and, therefore, summary judgment should not have been rendered.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hychko v. Didomizio, No. 109612 (Nov. 3, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11187 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 A.2d 722, 32 Conn. App. 912, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hychko-v-didomizio-connappct-1993.