Hybarger v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hybarger v. State

1912 OK CR 81, 120 P. 1127, 6 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 328

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 23, 1912

DocketNo. A-1104.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 81 (Hybarger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hybarger v. State, 1912 OK CR 81, 120 P. 1127, 6 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 328 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the county court of Garvin county at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquors, and on the 26th day of February, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for thirty days. The only logical conclusion that can be arrived at from the testimony in this case is that the liquor plaintiff in error is charged with having transported was an interstate shipment, and was not intended for any unlawful purpose. Under the doctrine of the Maynes case, recently announced by this court, and not yet officially reported, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to be proceeded with according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the county court of Garvin county at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquors, and on the 26th day of February, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for thirty days. The only logical conclusion that can be arrived at from the testimony in this case is that the liquor plaintiff in error is charged with having transported was an interstate shipment, and was not intended for any unlawful purpose. Under the doctrine of the Maynes case, recently announced by this court, and not yet officially reported, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to be proceeded with according to law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 81, 120 P. 1127, 6 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hybarger-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.