Me. Justice Blatchfoed
delivered the opinion of the court; He recited the facts as above stated, and continued:
The only question for decision is, by the stipulation of the parties, whether the property in question should have been sold in the manner in which personal property was required by the statute of Indiana to be sold.
The statute in force at the time, in regard to the sale of personal property on execution, 2 Rev. Stat. of Indiana, of 1852, part 2, ch. 1, act of June 18, 1852, art. 22, §§ 468, 469, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, p. 218, provided as follows: “ Sec. 468. Previous notice of the time and place of the sale of any personal property on execution shall be given for ten days successively, by posting up'written notices thereof in at least three of the most public places in the township where the sale is to be made. Sec. 469. Personal property shall not be sold unless the same shall be present and subject to the view of those attending the sale; and it shall be sold at public auction in such lots and parcels as shall be calculated to bring the highest price.”
The Revised Statutes of Indiana, of 1852, in force at the time, in regard to the sale of real estate on execution, 2 Rev. Stat., part 2, ch. 1, act of June 18, 1852, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, provided as follows, Art. 24, § 526, p. 232: “ Sec. 526. The following real estate shall be liable to all judgments and attachments, and to be sold on execution against the debtor owning the same, or for whose use the same is holden, viz.:
First.
All lands of the judgment debtor, whether in possession, reversion or remainder.
Second.
Lands fraudulently conveyed with intent to delay or defraud creditors. Third. All rights of redeeming mortgaged lands; also, all
lands held by virtue of any land-office certificate.
Fourth.
Lands, and any estate, or interest therein, holden by any one in trust for, or to the use of, another.
Fifth.
All chattels real of the judgment debtor.” Art. 22, § 463, p. 215; “Sec. 463. The estate or interest of the judgment debtor in any real estate shall not be sold on execution, until the rents and profits thereof, for a term not exceeding seven years, shall have been first offered for sale at public auction; but, if the same shall not sell for a sum sufficient to satisfy the execution, then the estate or interest of the judgment debtor shall be sold by virtue of the execution.” Art. 22, § 466, p. 217: “Sec. 466. Real estate, taken by virtue of any execution, shall be sold at public auction at the door of the court house of the county in which the same is situated; and, if the estate shall consist of several lots, tracts, and parcels, each shall be offered separately; and no more of any real estate shall be offered for sale than shall be necessary to satisfy the execution, unless the same is not susceptible of division.” Art. 22, § 467, as amended February 2,1855, p 217: “ Sec. 467. The time and place of making sale of real estate, on execution, shall be publicly advertised by the sheriff, for at least twenty days, súccessively, next before the day of sale,<by posting up written or printed notices thereof, in three public places in the township in which the real estate is situated, and a like advertisement at the door of the courthouse of the county; and also by advertising the same, for three weeks successively, in a newspaper printed nearest to the real estate, if any such newspaper be printed within the jurisdiction of the sheriff.”
In the rules prescribed by the act, Art. 48, § 797, p. 313, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, for its construction, it is enacted, that such rules shall be observed, “ when consistent with the context.” Among those rules are these — that “ the . word ‘land,’ and the phrases ‘real estate,’ and ‘real property,’ include lands, tenements and hereditaments;” and that “the phase ‘ personal property ’ includes goods, chattels, evidences of debt, and things in action.” But no definition or construction is given of the phrase “ chattels real.”
The Revised Statutes of Indiana, of 1843, act of February 11,
1843, part 2 chap. 29, Art. 1, § 1, provided as follows: “ Section 1. When, by any law of this- State, real estate is authorized or directed to be sold by virtue- of any execution, the same shall be construed to mean and include, 1. All the lands, tenements, and hereditaments of the judgment debtor, whether in possession, reversion or remainder. 2. Lands, tenements, and hereditaments fraudulently conveyed with intent to defeat, delay, or defraud creditors.. 3. All rights of redeeming mortgaged lands, tenements, or hereditaments, and also all lands held by virtue of any land-office certificate. 4. Lands, tenements, and hereditaments, and any estate or interest therein, holden by any one in trust for, or to, the use of, another, on exécution issued on any judgment against the person to whose use, or for whose benefit, the same are holden.” The provisions of these four clauses were substantially retained in the Revision of 1852, and the provision as to “ chattels real of, the judgment .debtor” was added as a 5th clause. Although, by the Revised Statutes of 1843; part 2, chap. 29, Art. 1, § 3, p. 454,- judgments were made a lien on real estate, and chattels real of the judgment debtor, which provision is contained in the Revision of 1852, part 2, chap. 1, Art. 24, § 527, of vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, chattels real were not specifically made liable to sale on execution as real estate, till 1852, when the 5th clause was added.
That clause must be interpreted according to the accepted-meaning of the words, “ chattels- real.” Blackstone defines chattels real, according to Sir Edward Coke, 1 Inst. 118, to be such as concern, or savor of, the realty, as terms for years of land, and says they are called real chattels, as being interests issuing out of, or annexed to, real- estates, of which they have one quality, viz., immobility, which denominates them
real,
but want the other, viz., a sufficient legaL indeterminate duration, which want it is that constitutes them
chattels.
' 2 Bl. Comm. 386. Chancellor Kent says, 2 Kent, 342: “ Chattels real are interests annexed to or concerning the realty, as a lease for years of land; and the duration of the term of the lease is immaterial, provided it be fixed and determinate, and there be a reversion or remainder in fee in some other person.”
The interest of the judgment debtors in this case in the land covered by the Bunting agreement was a chattel real ; and as the dispute here relates to machinery, buildings, fixtures and improvements situated on the Bunting premises, and held under the Bunting agreement, it follows that that property had impressed on it, by the statute, for the purposes of a sale on execution, the character of a chattel real, and became, for those purposes, real estate, and, therefore, was not required to be sold as personal property, present and subject to the view of ' those attending the sale, but was properly sold as real estate, at the door of the county court house.
The estate for years, or the interest in the land, could not be subject to view.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Me. Justice Blatchfoed
delivered the opinion of the court; He recited the facts as above stated, and continued:
The only question for decision is, by the stipulation of the parties, whether the property in question should have been sold in the manner in which personal property was required by the statute of Indiana to be sold.
The statute in force at the time, in regard to the sale of personal property on execution, 2 Rev. Stat. of Indiana, of 1852, part 2, ch. 1, act of June 18, 1852, art. 22, §§ 468, 469, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, p. 218, provided as follows: “ Sec. 468. Previous notice of the time and place of the sale of any personal property on execution shall be given for ten days successively, by posting up'written notices thereof in at least three of the most public places in the township where the sale is to be made. Sec. 469. Personal property shall not be sold unless the same shall be present and subject to the view of those attending the sale; and it shall be sold at public auction in such lots and parcels as shall be calculated to bring the highest price.”
The Revised Statutes of Indiana, of 1852, in force at the time, in regard to the sale of real estate on execution, 2 Rev. Stat., part 2, ch. 1, act of June 18, 1852, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, provided as follows, Art. 24, § 526, p. 232: “ Sec. 526. The following real estate shall be liable to all judgments and attachments, and to be sold on execution against the debtor owning the same, or for whose use the same is holden, viz.:
First.
All lands of the judgment debtor, whether in possession, reversion or remainder.
Second.
Lands fraudulently conveyed with intent to delay or defraud creditors. Third. All rights of redeeming mortgaged lands; also, all
lands held by virtue of any land-office certificate.
Fourth.
Lands, and any estate, or interest therein, holden by any one in trust for, or to the use of, another.
Fifth.
All chattels real of the judgment debtor.” Art. 22, § 463, p. 215; “Sec. 463. The estate or interest of the judgment debtor in any real estate shall not be sold on execution, until the rents and profits thereof, for a term not exceeding seven years, shall have been first offered for sale at public auction; but, if the same shall not sell for a sum sufficient to satisfy the execution, then the estate or interest of the judgment debtor shall be sold by virtue of the execution.” Art. 22, § 466, p. 217: “Sec. 466. Real estate, taken by virtue of any execution, shall be sold at public auction at the door of the court house of the county in which the same is situated; and, if the estate shall consist of several lots, tracts, and parcels, each shall be offered separately; and no more of any real estate shall be offered for sale than shall be necessary to satisfy the execution, unless the same is not susceptible of division.” Art. 22, § 467, as amended February 2,1855, p 217: “ Sec. 467. The time and place of making sale of real estate, on execution, shall be publicly advertised by the sheriff, for at least twenty days, súccessively, next before the day of sale,<by posting up written or printed notices thereof, in three public places in the township in which the real estate is situated, and a like advertisement at the door of the courthouse of the county; and also by advertising the same, for three weeks successively, in a newspaper printed nearest to the real estate, if any such newspaper be printed within the jurisdiction of the sheriff.”
In the rules prescribed by the act, Art. 48, § 797, p. 313, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, for its construction, it is enacted, that such rules shall be observed, “ when consistent with the context.” Among those rules are these — that “ the . word ‘land,’ and the phrases ‘real estate,’ and ‘real property,’ include lands, tenements and hereditaments;” and that “the phase ‘ personal property ’ includes goods, chattels, evidences of debt, and things in action.” But no definition or construction is given of the phrase “ chattels real.”
The Revised Statutes of Indiana, of 1843, act of February 11,
1843, part 2 chap. 29, Art. 1, § 1, provided as follows: “ Section 1. When, by any law of this- State, real estate is authorized or directed to be sold by virtue- of any execution, the same shall be construed to mean and include, 1. All the lands, tenements, and hereditaments of the judgment debtor, whether in possession, reversion or remainder. 2. Lands, tenements, and hereditaments fraudulently conveyed with intent to defeat, delay, or defraud creditors.. 3. All rights of redeeming mortgaged lands, tenements, or hereditaments, and also all lands held by virtue of any land-office certificate. 4. Lands, tenements, and hereditaments, and any estate or interest therein, holden by any one in trust for, or to, the use of, another, on exécution issued on any judgment against the person to whose use, or for whose benefit, the same are holden.” The provisions of these four clauses were substantially retained in the Revision of 1852, and the provision as to “ chattels real of, the judgment .debtor” was added as a 5th clause. Although, by the Revised Statutes of 1843; part 2, chap. 29, Art. 1, § 3, p. 454,- judgments were made a lien on real estate, and chattels real of the judgment debtor, which provision is contained in the Revision of 1852, part 2, chap. 1, Art. 24, § 527, of vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, chattels real were not specifically made liable to sale on execution as real estate, till 1852, when the 5th clause was added.
That clause must be interpreted according to the accepted-meaning of the words, “ chattels- real.” Blackstone defines chattels real, according to Sir Edward Coke, 1 Inst. 118, to be such as concern, or savor of, the realty, as terms for years of land, and says they are called real chattels, as being interests issuing out of, or annexed to, real- estates, of which they have one quality, viz., immobility, which denominates them
real,
but want the other, viz., a sufficient legaL indeterminate duration, which want it is that constitutes them
chattels.
' 2 Bl. Comm. 386. Chancellor Kent says, 2 Kent, 342: “ Chattels real are interests annexed to or concerning the realty, as a lease for years of land; and the duration of the term of the lease is immaterial, provided it be fixed and determinate, and there be a reversion or remainder in fee in some other person.”
The interest of the judgment debtors in this case in the land covered by the Bunting agreement was a chattel real ; and as the dispute here relates to machinery, buildings, fixtures and improvements situated on the Bunting premises, and held under the Bunting agreement, it follows that that property had impressed on it, by the statute, for the purposes of a sale on execution, the character of a chattel real, and became, for those purposes, real estate, and, therefore, was not required to be sold as personal property, present and subject to the view of ' those attending the sale, but was properly sold as real estate, at the door of the county court house.
The estate for years, or the interest in the land, could not be subject to view. The machinery, buildings, fixtures and improvements were created under the privilege given by the agreement to occupy the land with constructions and buildings for mining coal and other minerals, and, although Helphenstine
&
Co. had the right to remove the buildings and fixtures at the expiration of the agreement, yet, so long as they were held under the agreement, on the premises,, and were of the character referred to, they followed the term for years and partook of its character.
In
Barr v. Doe,
6 Blackford, 335, in 1843, it was held that a parol lease for three years was a chattel interest, and could be sold as a chattel, on an execution issued by a justice of the peace. But that decision does not apply to the statute now under consideration, and no case is cited or found in the courts of Indiana, which holds to the contrary of the views above expressed. Indeed, in the Revised Statutes of 1843, part 3, ch. 47, § 347, p. 992, form No. 10, the form prescribed for an execution by a justice of the peace was against “ goods and chattels,” while in the Revision of 1852, vol. 2 of Davis’ edition of 1876, part 5, ch. 127, form-No. 4, the form runs against “ goods” only.
The case of
Buhl
v.
Kenyon,
11 Mich. 249, is cited for the appellants. It was there held, that an estate for years in land was to be sold, on execution, as personal estate, and that a sale of it in accordance with the statutory provisions for the sale of real estate was void. The court proceeded on the ground that, as the statute of Michigan provided that the words “ real
estate, . . . when not inconsistent with the manifest intention of the legislature, . . . shall be construed to include lands, tenements, and real estate, and all rights thereto, and interests therein; ” and also provided that “ all the real estate of a debtor, whether in possession, reversion or remainder, including lands fraudulently conveyed, with intent to defeat, delay or defraud his creditors, and the equities and rights of redemption hereinafter mentioned, shall be subject to the payment of his , debts, and may be sold on execution .as hereinafter provided;” and also enacted, that “ all chattels, real or personal,- and all other goods liable to execution by the common law, may be taken and sold thereon, except as is otherwise provided by law; ” and, as a leasehold interest of the kind in question was a chattel interest, and was by the last named provision classed among personal property, it was not within the law applicable to the sale of lands on execution. In the present case, a chattel real is distinctly classed, by § 526, among “ real estate liable to be sold on execution,” and must, therefore, be sold in the manner in which § 466 directs that “real estate taken by virtue of any execution shall be sold.”
The point decided
in Meni
v. Rathbone, 21 Ind. 454, 461, was, that a lease for years, acquired by a wife during coverture, became the property of her husband, when reduced to possession by him, and, being a chattel, was personal property, under the definition before refereed to, and subject to the husband’s debts, and, being a chattel real, a judgment against the husband was, by the statute of 1852, a lien upon it.
The motion made in the Circuit Court to modify the decree was based on the idea, that, while the term for years might be a chattel real, the machinery, buildings, fixtures and improvements placed on the land rhould have been sold as personal property. As the statute requires that real estate “ shall ” be sold at the door of the court house, the visible property could not be’sold there in view of the persons attending the sale of the real estate, unless it was first severed from the land; and to have so treated it would, doubtless, have rendered not only it but the term of years worthless, as vendible articles. ' No such result could have been contemplated by the law-makers,
and none such can be allowed, if another reasonable and consistent construction is to be found.
It is not, necessary or proper to coSsider.any question in volved in any right of redemption. Nor is it intended to decide anything as to the status of any of the .property, aside from the lawfulness of the manner of its sale, under the statute in regard to such sale.
'The decree of the Circuit Court is
Affirmed.