Hyatt v. State

816 So. 2d 220, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6283, 2002 WL 925048
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 2002
DocketNo. 1D01-4491
StatusPublished

This text of 816 So. 2d 220 (Hyatt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyatt v. State, 816 So. 2d 220, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6283, 2002 WL 925048 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

Appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, conceding the correctness [221]*221of the trial court’s ruling on seven of his eight claims, but asserting error in the denial of his claim that defense counsel failed to inform him of the defense of voluntary intoxication. The court’s denial of this ground for relief based upon the sufficiency of the pleading is REVERSED on the authority of O’Bryant v. State, 765 So.2d 745 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'BRYANT v. State
765 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
816 So. 2d 220, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6283, 2002 WL 925048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyatt-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.