Hyatt v. Dale Manufacturing Co.

18 Jones & S. 526
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided February 4, 1884·Published

Opinion

O’ Gorman, J.

It was a matter in the discretion of the judge below, to hear a motion which had already been heard and denied by another judge at special term. It was within his discretion to grant or to deny it; and from the exercise of that discretion, u'nless it be manifestly abused, an appeal to this court will not be sustained. Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyatt v. Dale Manufacturing Co., 18 Jones & S. 526 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

18 Jones & S. 526 (Hyatt v. Dale Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.