Hyatt v. Dale Manufacturing Co.

18 Jones & S. 526
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedFebruary 4, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Jones & S. 526 (Hyatt v. Dale Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyatt v. Dale Manufacturing Co., 18 Jones & S. 526 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

O’ Gorman, J.

It was a matter in the discretion of the judge below, to hear a motion which had already been heard and denied by another judge at special term. It was within his discretion to grant or to deny it; and from the exercise of that discretion, u'nless it be manifestly abused, an appeal to this court will not be sustained. Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Jones & S. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyatt-v-dale-manufacturing-co-nysuperctnyc-1884.