Hyatt v. City of Milford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Hyatt v. City of Milford

600 A.2d 1359, 221 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 19

DecidedJanuary 7, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 600 A.2d 1359 (Hyatt v. City of Milford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyatt v. City of Milford, 600 A.2d 1359, 221 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 19 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 194, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies?

“2. Does General Statutes § 31-315 vest jurisdiction in the worker’s compensation commissioner to (a) interpret an award or (b) to modify an award with respect to payments due thereunder after the period for making such payments has expired?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 194, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies?

“2. Does General Statutes § 31-315 vest jurisdiction in the worker’s compensation commissioner to (a) interpret an award or (b) to modify an award with respect to payments due thereunder after the period for making such payments has expired?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 A.2d 1359, 221 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyatt-v-city-of-milford-conn-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack