Hyatt v. City of Milford

600 A.2d 1359, 221 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 19
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hyatt v. City of Milford. Read the opinion of the Court — 224 Conn. 441
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 7, 1992·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 194, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies?

“2. Does General Statutes § 31-315 vest jurisdiction in the worker’s compensation commissioner to (a) interpret an award or (b) to modify an award with respect to payments due thereunder after the period for making such payments has expired?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyatt v. City of Milford, 600 A.2d 1359, 221 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 19 (Colo. 1992).

600 A.2d 1359 (Hyatt v. City of Milford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hyatt v. City of Milford
600 A.2d 5 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)