Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 RYAN HYAMS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06278-HSG

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE 9 v. PRETRIAL ORDER

10 CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 138 11 Defendants.

12 13 On September 24, 2020 Plaintiffs Ryan Hyams and Regine Duhon (“Plaintiffs”) moved to 14 compel the lifting of certain redactions by Defendants CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, 15 Inc., Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, and CVS Rx Services, Inc. (collectively “CVS”). See Dkt. No. 16 116. On October 8, Magistrate Judge Illman issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion. See Dkt. 17 No. 127. On October 22, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from Judge Illman’s non-dispositive 18 pretrial order. See Dkt. No. 138. 19 A pretrial order by a magistrate judge will be reversed only if it “is clearly erroneous or 20 contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). The Court has carefully reviewed Judge Illman’s 21 order, Plaintiffs’ motion, and the relevant legal authorities. Judge Illman’s order is well-reasoned 22 and thorough. The Court affirms the non-dispositive order because it is not “clearly erroneous or 23 contrary to law.” See Grimes v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 240 (9th Cir. 1991). 24 Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for relief from Judge Illman’s non- 25 dispositive pretrial order. 26 // 27 // 2 || Dated: 10/23/2020 | □ ; HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 4 United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

QO 16

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28