H.W.J. Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. v. Rethceif Enterprises, LLC

Opinion

H.W.J. DESIGNS FOR AGRIBUSINESS, No. 1:17-cv-00272-AWI-SKO INC., et al. Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF v. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE RETHCEIF ENTERPRISES, LLC., et al., (Doc. 182) Defendants.

On November 13, 2010, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice.1 (Doc. 182.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

Sheila K. Oberto Dated: November 16, 2020 /s/ . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 The parties also requested that the Court “retain jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of resolving any controversy arising under” their confidential settlement agreement. (See Doc. 182 at 1.) The Court in its discretion declines the parties’ request. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994); Camacho v. City of San Luis, 359 F. App’x 794, 798 (9th Cir. 2009); California Sportfishing Prot. All. v. Agric. Mgmt. & Prod. Co., Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02328-KJM-AC, 2016 WL 4796841, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2016) (noting that “the court in its discretion typically declines to maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.”).