Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/H.V.R. Parts, Inc. v. Camile

H.V.R. Parts, Inc. v. Camile

528 So. 2d 142, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1700, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3135, 1988 WL 73622
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 20, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1098
StatusPublished

This text of 528 So. 2d 142 (H.V.R. Parts, Inc. v. Camile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H.V.R. Parts, Inc. v. Camile, 528 So. 2d 142, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1700, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3135, 1988 WL 73622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and motion to quash service of process. We affirm on the authority of Law Offices of Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So.2d 1382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The affidavit submitted by appellant in support of its motion to dismiss fails to rebut the allegation in appel-lee’s complaint regarding sale and delivery in Florida of the machine that injured ap-pellee.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Law Offices of Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel
480 So. 2d 1382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 142, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1700, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3135, 1988 WL 73622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hvr-parts-inc-v-camile-fladistctapp-1988.