Huzzen v. Huzzen

18 So. 2d 539, 154 Fla. 651, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 781
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 27, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 18 So. 2d 539 (Huzzen v. Huzzen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huzzen v. Huzzen, 18 So. 2d 539, 154 Fla. 651, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 781 (Fla. 1944).

Opinion

*652 PER CURIAM:

Appeal is from final decree denying divorce, directing the custody of a minor child and decreeing separate maintenance for the wife and minor child on bill of complaint, answer incorporating counter claim and testimony taken.

No useful purpose can be served by setting forth the evidence which is conflicting. We construe the decree as one for separate maintenance.

Appellant has failed to carry the burden of clearly showing that reversible error has occurred and as such is not apparent from the record, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered. ■

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 So. 2d 539, 154 Fla. 651, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huzzen-v-huzzen-fla-1944.