Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin
This text of Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin (Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 600 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL 33131 | tel 786.913.4900 | fax 786.913.4901 Geoffrey Sant tel: 212.858.1162 geoffrey.sant@pillsburylaw.com February 14, 2023 VIA ECF The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square, Room 2103 New York, NY 10007 Re: Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, et al. v. Hui Qin,Case No. 21 Civ. 9221 (KPF) — Petitioners’ Request for Leave to File Documents with Redactions and Under Seal Dear Judge Failla: We write on behalf of Petitioners Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership, and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership (“Petitioners”) to request leave to file certain documents with redactions and certain documents under seal, pursuant to the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order dated January 3, 2023, Dkt. No. 92. In conjunction with Petitioners’ Motion to Compel filed contemporaneously herewith, Petitioners respectfully request to file the following documents with redactions pursuant to Rule 9(B) of Your Honor’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases: (1) the Memorandum of Law; (11) the Declaration of Carol Lee, dated February 13, 2023 (“Lee Decl.”); and (iii) the Declaration of Lening Liu, dated February 12, 2023 (“Liu Decl.”). Petitioners respectfully request to file under seal the following exhibits to the Lee Decl. and the Liu Decl. pursuant to Rule 9(C) of Your Honor’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases:! Exhibit A letter from Amiad Kushner to Andrew Smith, dated January 24, 2023 Ex. B Lee Decl. A document bearing Bates-numbers Qin_00000512 and Qin_00000573 Ex. C produced by Qin in this action
' Petitioners seek to file the following documents under seal to be accessed by Your Honor and Respondent Hui Qin (“Qin”). www.pillsourylaw.com 4894-3529-3520
Lee Decl. A document bearing Bates-numbers Qin_00000944-948 produced by Qin in this Ex. D action, marked Confidential Lee Decl. A document bearing Bates-numbers Qin_00000848-851 produced by Qin in this Ex. E action, marked Confidential Lee Decl. Seiden Law Group LLP’s Objections and Responses to Petitioners’ Information Ex. I Subpoena, dated November 28, 2022 Lee Decl. A letter from Geoffrey Sant to Amiad Kushner, dated February 10, 2023 Ex. K Lee Decl. An email from Sarah Madigan to Amiad Kushner, dated January 20, 2023, Ex. L attaching a January 20, 2023 letter from Andrew Smith to Amiad Kushner and a restraining notice issued to Qin Lee Decl. A document showing legal fees, produced by Benjamin Xue in this action, Ex. M marked CONFIDENTIAL Lee Decl. A letter from Amiad Kushner to Andrew Smith, dated February 13, 2023, and Ex. N the Supplemental Declaration of Hui Qin Lee Decl. A document bearing Bates-numbers Qin_00000506-585, produced by Qin in Ex. O this action, marked Confidential Lee Decl. The transcript of the Deposition of Hui Qin, dated January 30, 2023, marked Ex. P CONFIDENTIAL Lee Decl. A document bearing Bates-numbers Qin_00002208-2212, produced by Qin in Ex. Q this action, marked Confidential Lee Decl. Xue & Associates, P.C.’s response to Petitioners’ subpoena for deposition on Ex. S written questions, dated January 13, 2023 Lee Decl. Images from the January 30, 2023 Deposition of Hui Qin, which was designated Ex. T confidential Lee Decl. Petitioners’ Requests for Production to Qin Appendix A Lee Decl. Petitioners’ First Set of Post-Judgment Interrogatories to Qin Appendix B Liu Decl. An excerpt of the transcript of the Deposition of Hui Qin, dated January 30, Ex. 2 2023, marked Confidential Pursuant to Rule 9 of Your Honor’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, a party seeking to file a document under seal must address the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. The Second Circuit set forth the relevant standard Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under Lugosch, “[t]here is a common law presumption in favor of permitting public access to judicial documents, which are those documents ‘relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process.’” GoSMiLE, Inc. v. Dr. Jonathan Levine, D.M.D. P.C., 769 F. Supp. 2d 630, 649 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (quoting Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 119). A court balances this common law presumption of access against competing comparisons, including “the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.” Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995)). Thus, the issue is whether “the privacy interests of the defendants outweigh the presumption of public access.” GoSMiLE, 769 F. Supp. 2d at 649-50. Here, the Memorandum of Law, the Lee Decl., Lee Decl. Exhibits 3-11 and 13, and Liu Decl. Exhibit 2 each contain sensitive personal identifying information, such as Qin’s addresses, bank account information, tax returns, properties, and minor family members. Certain of these documents were also marked Confidential pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order by Qin. The parties’ interest in protecting confidential information, specifically sensitive personal identifying information, overcomes the presumption of access. Indeed, Your Honor has previously granted Petitioners’ request to file under seal certain exhibits to protect certain sensitive personal identifying information, which was clearly visible. See Dkt. No. 58. Because these documents contain confidential information of the kind that is deserving of protection and restricting public access, Petitioners respectfully request that the Court grant their request to redact their Memorandum of Law, the Lee Decl., and the Liu Decl., and to file the Lee Decl. Exhibits B, C, D, E, 1, K, L, M, O, P, Q, S, and T and the Liu Decl. Exhibit 2 under seal.
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Geoffrey Sant Geoffrey Sant
ce: All counsel of record (via ECF)
Application GRANTED. Petitioners may file redacted versions of their opening memorandum of law and supportive declarations from Lening Liu and Carol Lee. The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain the unredacted versions of those documents (Dkt. #108, 109, 111) under seal, viewable only to the parties and the Court. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 105.
Dated: February 15, 2023 SO ORDERED. New York, New York ia Hthres fle alo HON. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4894-3529-3520
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huzhou-chuangtai-rongyuan-investment-management-partnership-v-qin-nysd-2023.