Huxford v. Stoddart
This text of 10 N.Y.S. 958 (Huxford v. Stoddart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to recover for services as a real-estate broker in procuring for the defendant a purchaser of her farm and of certain personal property. Plaintiff’s claim that he was procuring cause of the sale, under an employment as broker for that purpose, appears to have been sharply contested at the trial, and it was submitted to the jury under a charge which carefully guarded all the rights of the defendant. The record discloses no error constituting, under the circumstances of the case, ground for reversal, The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 N.Y.S. 958, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huxford-v-stoddart-superctny-1890.