Hutts v. State
20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 891, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 342 Ark. 278 →
Opinion
Appellant James Hutts, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, John C. ■ Riedel, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hutts v. State, 20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 891, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 366 (Ark. 2000).
20 S.W.3d 412 (Hutts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.