Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

589 F. App'x 123
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Read the opinion of the Court — 582 F. App'x 244
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2014·No. No. 14-1974·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Hugh Hutton appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for a trial hearing. We have reviewed the record and Hutton’s informal brief on appeal, and we conclude that this appeal is frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 589 F. App'x 123 (4th Cir. 2014).

589 F. App'x 123 (Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)