Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson

Montana Supreme Court

Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson

63 P.2d 639, 102 Mont. 606, 1936 Mont. LEXIS 86

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 18, 1936

DocketNo. 7,513.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 P.2d 639 (Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson, 63 P.2d 639, 102 Mont. 606, 1936 Mont. LEXIS 86 (Mo. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled action the plaintiff (respondent) by his attorneys having filed separate motions, *607 one as to each defendant, for a dismissal of the appeal in said action on the ground that more than sixty days have expired since the filing of the notice of appeal, and no extension having been granted and no transcript having been filed in this court up to this date, and notice of this motion having been served upon counsel for appellant more than ten days heretofore, the court this day considers said motion, and orders that said appeal be dismissed.

Mr. Bockwood Brown, Mr. Horace 8. Davis and Mr. Melvin N. Hoiness, for Appellants. Mr. B. E. West and Mr. E. J. Stromnes, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled action the plaintiff (respondent) by his attorneys having filed separate motions, *607 one as to each defendant, for a dismissal of the appeal in said action on the ground that more than sixty days have expired since the filing of the notice of appeal, and no extension having been granted and no transcript having been filed in this court up to this date, and notice of this motion having been served upon counsel for appellant more than ten days heretofore, the court this day considers said motion, and orders that said appeal be dismissed.

Mr. Bockwood Brown, Mr. Horace 8. Davis and Mr. Melvin N. Hoiness, for Appellants. Mr. B. E. West and Mr. E. J. Stromnes, for Respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 P.2d 639, 102 Mont. 606, 1936 Mont. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutton-v-union-central-life-insurance-co-severson-mont-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack