Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson

63 P.2d 639, 102 Mont. 606, 1936 Mont. LEXIS 86
Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1936·No. No. 7,513.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled action the plaintiff (respondent) by his attorneys having filed separate motions, *607 one as to each defendant, for a dismissal of the appeal in said action on the ground that more than sixty days have expired since the filing of the notice of appeal, and no extension having been granted and no transcript having been filed in this court up to this date, and notice of this motion having been served upon counsel for appellant more than ten days heretofore, the court this day considers said motion, and orders that said appeal be dismissed.

Mr. Bockwood Brown, Mr. Horace 8. Davis and Mr. Melvin N. Hoiness, for Appellants. Mr. B. E. West and Mr. E. J. Stromnes, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson, 63 P.2d 639, 102 Mont. 606, 1936 Mont. LEXIS 86 (Mo. 1936).

63 P.2d 639 (Hutton v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., Severson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanson v. Hanson
273 P.2d 103 (Montana Supreme Court, 1954)