Hutton v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hutton v. King

197 S.W.3d 236, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2006 WL 2129018

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. WD 66147·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Melba Hutton appeals the jury verdict in favor of defendants Dale Shipley and Shipley & Kjar, L.L.C., in her malpractice action against Mr. Shipley and his law firm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Melba Hutton appeals the jury verdict in favor of defendants Dale Shipley and Shipley & Kjar, L.L.C., in her malpractice action against Mr. Shipley and his law firm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Hutton v. King, 197 S.W.3d 236, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2006 WL 2129018 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

197 S.W.3d 236 (Hutton v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.