Hutton v. Indiana Central Railway Co.

7 Ind. 522
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 Ind. 522 (Hutton v. Indiana Central Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutton v. Indiana Central Railway Co., 7 Ind. 522 (Ind. 1856).

Opinion

Stuart, J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are the owners of lots numbers one and two, in block fourteen, fronting on Second street, in Cambridge City, Indiana; that the lots are improved with dwelling-houses, out-houses, &e.; that in constructing their road along said street, the railroad company erected an embankment ten feet high, in front of and up to the line of said premises, cutting off all access to them in front, and deluging the houses and garden with water, to the special damage of the plaintiffs 800 dollars. Demurrer to the complaint sustained, and final judgment for the defendant.

This was erroneous. The demurrer is not conformed to the statute—is not, in form or substance, any of the six statutory causes. For that alone, the demurrer should have been overruled. Lane v. The State, ante, p. 426.

The complaint is also good. This case can not be distinguished from that of Tate v. The Ohio arid Mississippi Railroad Company, ante, p. 479. For the reasons there given, the law is with the plaintiff.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &e.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wade v. Huber
38 N.E. 351 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1894)
Hildebrand v. McCrum
101 Ind. 61 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ind. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutton-v-indiana-central-railway-co-ind-1856.