Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. v. Horton
This text of 105 S.E. 2 (Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbis cause was finally determined by tbis Court, Fall Term, 1919, and is reported 178 N. C., 548. Upon tbe coming down of tbe opinion, tbe defendant tendered a judgment, wbicb tbe court refused to sign. Tbe court rendered tbe following judgment:
Upon consideration of tbe certificate of tbe Supreme Court filed herein, it is therefore ordered that tbe former judgment be, and it is, affirmed, as to Wood Horton and Larkin Horton, and as to Charlie Horton and Robert Welch tbe action is dismissed. The said Charlie Horton and Robert Welch will recover their costs in tbe Superior Court.
W. J. Adams,
Judge Presiding.
We are of opinion that tbe judgment rendered by bis Honor is in strict conformity with tbe opinion of tbis Court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 S.E. 2, 180 N.C. 674, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutton-bourbonnais-co-v-horton-nc-1920.