Hutto v. State
133 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 364, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 352
This text of 133 S.E. 105 (Hutto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hutto v. State, 133 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 364, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 352 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
1. There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, or in any of the assignments of error in the bill of exceptions.
2. The evidence is ample to support the verdict. Although circumstantial, it is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 364, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutto-v-state-gactapp-1926.