Hutt v. Corser

California Supreme Court

Hutt v. Corser

217 Cal. 606

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1933

DocketL. A. No. 13098

StatusPublished

This text of 217 Cal. 606 (Hutt v. Corser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutt v. Corser, 217 Cal. 606 (Cal. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PRESTON, J.

Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent’s. claims.

The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.

Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRESTON, J.

Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent’s. claims.

The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.

Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 Cal. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutt-v-corser-cal-1933.