Hutson v. CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc.)

318 B.R. 637, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26181
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina
DecidedDecember 17, 2004
Docket02-83138, 1:03CV01152
StatusPublished

This text of 318 B.R. 637 (Hutson v. CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutson v. CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc.), 318 B.R. 637, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26181 (M.D.N.C. 2004).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ORDER

TILLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal arises out of an order entered on September 16, 2003, by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in the bankruptcy case of E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc.; E-Z Serve Corporation; SSCH Holding Corp.; Swifty Serve, LLC; and Swifty Serve Holding Corp. (collectively the “Debtors”). In re E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc., et al., 299 B.R. 126 (Bankr.M.D.N.C.2003). The order denied the portion of a motion by Debtors’ Delaware bankruptcy counsel, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell (“MNAT”), that sought to transfer the remaining balance of their retainer to the Trustee, Richard M. Hut-son, II, free and clear of any pre-petition or post-petition liens. The Bankruptcy Court’s decision found that (1) the Debtors’ right to recover the balance of MNAT’s retainer was a general intangible of the Debtors; (2) § 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code did not apply; and (3) CIT had a perfected first priority lien in the Debtors’ general intangibles which included the balance of the MNAT retainer. This matter is currently before the Court on appeal by the Trustee. Oral arguments were held on September 28, 2004. After considering the parties’ briefs and oral arguments, this Court adopts the reasoning outlined in Judge Carruthers’ bankruptcy opinion. 299 B.R. 126.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the decision and the order of the bankruptcy court, entered September 16, 2003, denying the portion of MNAT’s motion that sought to transfer its retainer free and clear of all liens to the bankruptcy estate is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc.
299 B.R. 126 (M.D. North Carolina, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 B.R. 637, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutson-v-cit-groupbusiness-credit-inc-in-re-e-z-serve-convenience-ncmd-2004.