Hutson v. Briggs

Ohio Supreme Court

Hutson v. Briggs

165 N.E. 534, 120 Ohio St. 58, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 58, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 396

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 20, 1929

Docket21208

StatusPublished

This text of 165 N.E. 534 (Hutson v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutson v. Briggs, 165 N.E. 534, 120 Ohio St. 58, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 58, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 396 (Ohio 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

It appearing, that three of the judges of the court, to wit, Kinkade, Jones and. Allen, are of opinion that the judgment herein should be affirmed, and three of the judges of the court, to wit, Robinson, Matthias and Day, are in favor of a judgment of reversal, and one judge, to wit, Marshall, C. J., does not participate, the court being thus equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case and unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.'

Kinkade, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur. Marshall, O. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

It appearing, that three of the judges of the court, to wit, Kinkade, Jones and. Allen, are of opinion that the judgment herein should be affirmed, and three of the judges of the court, to wit, Robinson, Matthias and Day, are in favor of a judgment of reversal, and one judge, to wit, Marshall, C. J., does not participate, the court being thus equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case and unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.'

Kinkade, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur. Marshall, O. J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 N.E. 534, 120 Ohio St. 58, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 58, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutson-v-briggs-ohio-1929.