Hutsler v. Vasto

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hutsler v. Vasto

323 S.W.3d 820, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 2010 WL 3743678

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 2010·No. WD 71769·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Hutsler filed a petition in the Platte County Circuit Court seeking an Order of Protection against Mark Vasto, based on repeated confrontations between the two. Vasto failed to appear at the hearing on Hutsler’s request for a full Order of Protection. The circuit court granted Hutsler a default judgment, and later denied Vasto’s Motion to Set Aside the default. Vasto appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Hutsler filed a petition in the Platte County Circuit Court seeking an Order of Protection against Mark Vasto, based on repeated confrontations between the two. Vasto failed to appear at the hearing on Hutsler’s request for a full Order of Protection. The circuit court granted Hutsler a default judgment, and later denied Vasto’s Motion to Set Aside the default. Vasto appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Hutsler v. Vasto, 323 S.W.3d 820, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 2010 WL 3743678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 820 (Hutsler v. Vasto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.