Hutno v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.
113 A. 68, 270 Pa. 14, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 313
Opinion
The competent evidence produced at the hearing clearly warrants the finding of the'Compensation board that “at the time of the parade deceased was driving a team of mules belonging to defendant, as his (the driver’s) voluntary act and as hist individual contribution toward the parade” and that “the parade was not held during the working hours of the deceased and he was not under pay of the defendant at that time.” The disallowance of compensation was, therefore, not error.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hutno v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co., 113 A. 68, 270 Pa. 14, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 313 (Pa. 1921).
113 A. 68 (Hutno v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lehman v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.
258 N.W. 821 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
Saylor v. Gehley's Carpet Store
9 Pa. D. & C. 509 (York County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Houlehan v. Pullman Co.
124 A. 640 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)