Hutnick v. Beil
161 S.W.3d 847, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 329, 2005 WL 465898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutnick v. Beil. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 603 →
Opinion
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment that approved the final accounting for a trust. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hutnick v. Beil, 161 S.W.3d 847, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 329, 2005 WL 465898 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
161 S.W.3d 847 (Hutnick v. Beil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)