Hutkoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 30 Misc. 802 (Hutkoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence of the witness Sammeck warrants a conclusion that the-glass was in good condition when it was delivered upon the car. .
[803]*803As the defendant’s counsel upon the argument conceded that if this conclusion was warranted the judgment must be affirmed, it is-affirmed, with costs.
Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Misc. 802, 63 N.Y.S. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutkoff-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappterm-1900.