Hutchman's Executor's Appeal

27 Pa. 209
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Knox, J.

We are satisfied with the decision made in this case by the learned President of the Common Pleas. Whether machinery in a building used for manufacturing purposes, is real or personal property, depends somewhat upon its character, its connexion with the building, and more upon the interest which the owner of the machinery has in the freehold. But whether it is realty or personalty, an execution-creditor who levies upon it, and sells it as personalty, is entitled to the proceeds of the sale. The purchaser buys at his own risk. He gets a good title if it is personal property, and if not, he gets nothing. Judgment-creditors whose liens have attached may prevent the severance where the machinery is realty, or perhaps pursue the property after severance, but they have no lien upon the fund raised by its' sale as personal estate.

Decree affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchman's Executor's Appeal, 27 Pa. 209 (Pa. 1856).

27 Pa. 209 (Hutchman's Executor's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Howard
47 Pa. D. & C. 64 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1942)
In re Penn Brewing Co.
21 F. Supp. 633 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1937)