Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co.

192 Ill. App. 464
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 28, 1915
DocketGen. No. 19,811
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 192 Ill. App. 464 (Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co., 192 Ill. App. 464 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

7. Evidence, § 410*—when opinion as to time elapsing between injury and condition proper. In an action for personal injuries, in the examination of a physician, where the subject-matter of the inquiry then under consideration was whether paralysis, if produced by an injury, would necessarily follow almost immediately, and also whether or not an injury such as the plaintiff claimed to have sustained was capable of producing paralysis, it was held competent for the witness to express his opinion thereon and to state his reasons for such opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walczak v. General Motors Corp.
340 N.E.2d 684 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
Slovinski v. Beasley
45 N.E.2d 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1942)
Rost v. F. H. Noble & Co.
232 Ill. App. 430 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 Ill. App. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchison-v-chicago-city-railway-co-illappct-1915.