Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co.

192 Ill. App. 464
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 28, 1915·No. Gen. No. 19,811·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

7. Evidence, § 410*—when opinion as to time elapsing between injury and condition proper. In an action for personal injuries, in the examination of a physician, where the subject-matter of the inquiry then under consideration was whether paralysis, if produced by an injury, would necessarily follow almost immediately, and also whether or not an injury such as the plaintiff claimed to have sustained was capable of producing paralysis, it was held competent for the witness to express his opinion thereon and to state his reasons for such opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co., 192 Ill. App. 464 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

192 Ill. App. 464 (Hutchison v. Chicago City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walczak v. General Motors Corp.
340 N.E.2d 684 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
Slovinski v. Beasley
45 N.E.2d 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1942)
Rost v. F. H. Noble & Co.
232 Ill. App. 430 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1924)