Hutchinson v. State
This text of 1928 OK CR 176 (Hutchinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the county *87 court of Carter county, Okla., on an information which charged that he willfully and unlawfully conveyed certain spirituous liquor, vinous liquor, malt liquor, fermented liquor, and intoxicating liquor, to wit, nine and one-half gallons of corn whisky. He was convicted and sentenced to serve a term of 60 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100 and costs, and has appealed to this court.
All the errors assigned relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction.
Con Keirsey, deputy sheriff of Carter county, testified on behalf of the state: That on the 27th day of April, 1925, he saw the defendant on the highway between Wilson and Healdton. He was driving in a Ford car, accompanied by G. L. Lasiter. That the defendant and Lasiter had nine and one-half gallons of corn whisky in the car when he came up to it. That he followed them for some distance.
Defendant denied that he had any interest in the whisky or the car, and stated that the car and the whisky belonged to G. L. Lasiter. The defendant admitted that he was in the car with Lasiter, and that the whisky was in the car when the officer overtook, the car.
The question of the guilt or innocence of defend» ant was, under proper instructions of the court, submitted to the jury. The evidence in the case is. conflicting, but, where there is credible evidence to support the verdict of the jury, this court will not. disturb the verdict.
The record examined, and evidence held sufficient to sustain the conviction. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1928 OK CR 176, 267 P. 284, 40 Okla. Crim. 86, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.