Hutchinson v. State
865 S.W.2d 445, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1799, 1993 WL 478983
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutchinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 115 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hutchinson v. State, 865 S.W.2d 445, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1799, 1993 WL 478983 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
865 S.W.2d 445 (Hutchinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.