Hutchinson v. State Farm Insurance Companies
This text of 349 So. 2d 953 (Hutchinson v. State Farm Insurance Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For reasons this day assigned in McMillan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al, La.App., 349 So.2d 949, the judgment of the district court in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Helen J. McMillan Stilley, and against plaintiff, Thomas Hutchinson, is hereby reversed and set aside; and, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff, Thomas Hutchinson, and against Linda T. Oliphant, Helen J. McMillan Stilley and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in solido, in the sum of $2,930.00, together with legal interest thereon from date of judicial demand, until paid. In all other respects the judgment appealed is affirmed. The costs in these consolidated cases are assessed one-third to Mrs. McMillan, individually, and two-thirds against Mrs. Linda T. Opiphant and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in solido.
REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART AND RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
349 So. 2d 953, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-state-farm-insurance-companies-lactapp-1977.