Hutchinson v. Dow

California Court of Appeal

Hutchinson v. Dow

297 P.2d 38, 140 Cal. App. 2d 957, 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 2349

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutchinson v. Dow. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Cal. App. 2d 47 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided April 2, 1956·No. Civ. No. 17057·Published

Opinion

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The appeal herein is from an order of September 7, 1955, which is described in our opinion this day filed in Dow v. Superior Court, No. 1 Civil 16939, ante, p. 399 [297 P.2d 30].

Respondent herein has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the asserted ground that the order in question is nonappealable. We hold that those provisions of the order which direct the payment of money or the distribution of property are appealable for the reasons stated in our opinion in No. 16939.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Peters, P. J., and Bray, J., concurred.

Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 29, 1956.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The appeal herein is from an order of September 7, 1955, which is described in our opinion this day filed in Dow v. Superior Court, No. 1 Civil 16939, ante, p. 399 [297 P.2d 30].

Respondent herein has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the asserted ground that the order in question is nonappealable. We hold that those provisions of the order which direct the payment of money or the distribution of property are appealable for the reasons stated in our opinion in No. 16939.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Peters, P. J., and Bray, J., concurred.

Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 29, 1956.

Hutchinson v. Dow, 297 P.2d 38, 140 Cal. App. 2d 957, 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 2349 (Cal. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

297 P.2d 38 (Hutchinson v. Dow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related