Hutchinson v. Covert

51 F. 832, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1833
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
DecidedJune 8, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 F. 832 (Hutchinson v. Covert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchinson v. Covert, 51 F. 832, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1833 (circtndil 1892).

Opinion

Blodgett, District Judge.

This ease involves the alleged infringement of complainants’ star trade-mark, the origin and title to which are set out in the bill substantially as in the preceding case of Same Complainants v. Blumberg, 51 Fed. Rep. 829. The infringement charged against defendant consists in the use of the words “ Lone Star,” and symbol of a single star on shirts and underwear made or sold by defendant. I am of opinion that the prefix of the word “Lone” to the word and symbol “Star” in defendant’s trade-mark is an infringement of the complainants’ star trade-mark, as applied to shirts, underwear, etc. It is a mark and designation of defendant’s goods which may give color to the assumed right to sell defendant’s goods as “Star Shirts,” “Star Underwear,” “Star Goods,” etc., and thereby deceive purchasers and users into the belief that they are buying the genuine complainants’ goods. A decree for an injunction and accounting may be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaut-Reith Shoe Co. v. International Shoe Co.
45 App. D.C. 545 (D.C. Circuit, 1917)
Coca-Cola Co. v. Nashville Syrup Co.
200 F. 157 (D. Tennessee, 1912)
Hutchinson, Pierce & Co. v. Loewy
163 F. 42 (Second Circuit, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F. 832, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-covert-circtndil-1892.