Hutchinson v. Conkling
162 A. 755, 111 N.J. Eq. 471, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757
This text of 162 A. 755 (Hutchinson v. Conkling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hutchinson v. Conkling, 162 A. 755, 111 N.J. Eq. 471, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757 (N.J. 1932).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Teenohaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Daly v. Lanucha
81 A.2d 826 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Pascall v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
185 A. 478 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 A. 755, 111 N.J. Eq. 471, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-conkling-nj-1932.