Hutchinson v. Conkling

162 A. 755, 111 N.J. Eq. 471, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

For affirmance — The Chancellob, Teenohaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchinson v. Conkling, 162 A. 755, 111 N.J. Eq. 471, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

162 A. 755 (Hutchinson v. Conkling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.