Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co.

79 S.E. 1125, 140 Ga. 792, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 265

DecidedNovember 12, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.E. 1125 (Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co., 79 S.E. 1125, 140 Ga. 792, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 265 (Ga. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

The defendants having pleaded that they were residents of counties of. this State other than that of the venue of suit, and the evidence authorizing a finding that the plea was true, this court will not reverse the judgment refusing to grant an injunction against the defendants, as ancillary to any equitable relief prayed against them. Etowah Milling Co. v. Crenshaw, 116 Ga. 406 (42 S. E. 709).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The defendants having pleaded that they were residents of counties of. this State other than that of the venue of suit, and the evidence authorizing a finding that the plea was true, this court will not reverse the judgment refusing to grant an injunction against the defendants, as ancillary to any equitable relief prayed against them. Etowah Milling Co. v. Crenshaw, 116 Ga. 406 (42 S. E. 709).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.E. 1125, 140 Ga. 792, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-columbus-power-co-ga-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack