Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co.

79 S.E. 1125, 140 Ga. 792, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 265
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1913·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

The defendants having pleaded that they were residents of counties of. this State other than that of the venue of suit, and the evidence authorizing a finding that the plea was true, this court will not reverse the judgment refusing to grant an injunction against the defendants, as ancillary to any equitable relief prayed against them. Etowah Milling Co. v. Crenshaw, 116 Ga. 406 (42 S. E. 709).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co., 79 S.E. 1125, 140 Ga. 792, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 265 (Ga. 1913).

79 S.E. 1125 (Hutchinson v. Columbus Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Etowah Milling Co. v. Crenshaw
42 S.E. 709 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)