Hutchinson v. Columbus

Ohio Circuit Courts

Hutchinson v. Columbus

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 573

DecidedJuly 1, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 573 (Hutchinson v. Columbus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutchinson v. Columbus, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 573 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum of Decision.

This case involved the constitutionality of Sec. 2289a, Rev. Stat., passed January 11, 1893, curing irregularities in the passage of ordinances in violation of Sec. 1694, Rev. Stat., by passing several ordinances by the one vote. The plaintiff was assessed for a street improvement. She enioined the collection of the assessment, claiming that it was illegal, on the ground, among others, that the law curing omnibus legislation by the city councils was unconstitutional. The circuit court, however, held the law to be constitutional and that the plaintiff was liable for the assessment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum of Decision.

This case involved the constitutionality of Sec. 2289a, Rev. Stat., passed January 11, 1893, curing irregularities in the passage of ordinances in violation of Sec. 1694, Rev. Stat., by passing several ordinances by the one vote. The plaintiff was assessed for a street improvement. She enioined the collection of the assessment, claiming that it was illegal, on the ground, among others, that the law curing omnibus legislation by the city councils was unconstitutional. The circuit court, however, held the law to be constitutional and that the plaintiff was liable for the assessment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-columbus-ohiocirct-1896.