Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Hutchinson v. City of Valdosta

Hutchinson v. City of Valdosta

63 S.E. 1120, 132 Ga. 342, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 91
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 10, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.E. 1120 (Hutchinson v. City of Valdosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchinson v. City of Valdosta, 63 S.E. 1120, 132 Ga. 342, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 91 (Ga. 1909).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

The general rule is that a court of equity will not by injunction prevent the prosecution of a person for an alleged violation, of a municipal ordinance; nor will it, upon a petition for injunction of such a nature, inquire into the constitutionality, validity, or reasonableness of the ordinance for the alleged violation of which the prosecution has been instituted. White v. City of Tifton, 129 Ga. 582 (59 S. E. 299), and eases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. O. S. Morgan, for plaintiff. Denmark & Griffin, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. City of Tifton
59 S.E. 299 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 S.E. 1120, 132 Ga. 342, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-city-of-valdosta-ga-1909.