Hutchinson v. Chicago & A. R. R. Co.
67 Ill. App. 96, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 18
This text of 67 Ill. App. 96 (Hutchinson v. Chicago & A. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hutchinson v. Chicago & A. R. R. Co., 67 Ill. App. 96, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 18 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an action to recover damages for a personal injury, in which, at the close of the evidence, the court erroneously instructed the jury to find for the appellee.
If we explain why we say erroneously, what we say may operate unfairly upon another trial, and therefore we simply reverse the judgment and remand the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
67 Ill. App. 96, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-chicago-a-r-r-co-illappct-1896.