Hutchinson v. Burr

12 Cal. 103
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Cal. 103 (Hutchinson v. Burr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchinson v. Burr, 12 Cal. 103 (Cal. 1859).

Opinion

Field, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

The plaintiff seeks to enjoin the issuance of bonds of the City and County of San Francisco by the Fund Commissioners, created by the Act of April 20,1858, for the claims approved by the Board of Examiners under that Act. The persons to whom, according to the report of the Examiners, the bonds are to be issued, are not made parties to the suit, and without their presence there can be no binding determination of the questions upon which the decision of this Court is desired, unless, perhaps, from the special circumstances of the case, the great [104]*104number of persons to whom the bonds are to be issued, and the character of the parties involved, it may answer to bring in only a sufficient number to fully represent and protect the interests of all; but upon this we express no opinion. It is enough to sustain the judgment, on the demurrer, that none of the persons entitled to the bonds under the Act, are made parties. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walrath v. Board of County Commissioners
18 N.M. 101 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Cal. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-burr-cal-1859.